Comments on: Public Interest Litigations http://blog.wakeupindia.org/2007/04/public-interest-litigations/ Discuss social issues and reach out to people who want to make a difference. Join us! Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:04:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: amitagwl http://blog.wakeupindia.org/2007/04/public-interest-litigations/comment-page-1/#comment-1693 amitagwl Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:28:52 +0000 http://blog.wakeupindia.org/2007/04/21/public-interest-litigations/#comment-1693 Thanks Aman. All the powers are to be exercised with lot of responsibility. I am sure with the help of awared citizens like you, we can put this power to a great use. Thanks for stopping by. Thanks Aman. All the powers are to be exercised with lot of responsibility. I am sure with the help of awared citizens like you, we can put this power to a great use. Thanks for stopping by.

]]> By: Aman.. http://blog.wakeupindia.org/2007/04/public-interest-litigations/comment-page-1/#comment-495 Aman.. Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:43:47 +0000 http://blog.wakeupindia.org/2007/04/21/public-interest-litigations/#comment-495 Prior to 1980s, Only the aggrieved party could personally knock the doors of justice and seek remedy for his grievance and any other person who was not personally affected could not knock the doors of justice as a proxy for the victim or the aggrieved party. In other words, only the affected parties had the locus standi (standing required in law) to file a case and continue the litigation and the non affected persons had no locus standi to do so.. This may be a very helpful step towards providing justice but it surely has some probles attached to it.. PIL is sometimes misused by people.. People with baseless reasons file PILs.. thus wasting time of the Court.. But PILs have surely helped the judicial system.. It was really nice reading your blog.. Good Work.. Regards.. Aman.. http://tigersinindia.blogspot.com Prior to 1980s, Only the aggrieved party could personally knock the doors of justice and seek remedy for his grievance and any other person who was not personally affected could not knock the doors of justice as a proxy for the victim or the aggrieved party. In other words, only the affected parties had the locus standi (standing required in law) to file a case and continue the litigation and the non affected persons had no locus standi to do so..

This may be a very helpful step towards providing justice but it surely has some probles attached to it.. PIL is sometimes misused by people.. People with baseless reasons file PILs.. thus wasting time of the Court..

But PILs have surely helped the judicial system..

It was really nice reading your blog.. Good Work..

Regards..

Aman..

http://tigersinindia.blogspot.com

]]>